Circuit Court, Pasco County, 24-CF-5093

Mr. Warren represented a nineteen-year-old facing four serious gun-related felony charges. Although the allegations were grave, the case stemmed from a genuine mistake and was complicated by a witness who misinterpreted the young man’s actions. Despite the client having previously received leniency from the justice system, the Firm took the case and promised to do all it could to help the young man avoid prison. After the Firm conducted a thorough background investigation, Mr. Warren presented strong mitigation evidence to the State. Thankfully, the government was wise and gave the young man a second chance. Not only did the client avoid prison, he was placed on probation and, if successfully completed, he will avoid a permanent criminal conviction.

Second District Court of Appeal, Florida, 2D24-1151

Mr. Warren was retained to defend a trial court ruling by the Honorable Alicia Polk in an appellate case involving a complex easement dispute in rural Pasco County. The appeal raised novel legal questions about the interpretation and maintenance obligations of rural easements. After extensive briefing, the Second District Court of Appeal sided with Mr. Warren’s position and dismissed the appeal.

Pharmacy Negligence Confidential Settlement (Lawsuit Filed)

Mr. Warren sued a national pharmacy in a wrongful death action for breach of the prevailing standard of care. The Firm retained experts and spent hundreds of hours organizing discovery, which consisted of thousands of medical documents spanning more than a decade. Eventually, after four years of contested litigation, Mr. Warren presented the Firm’s findings during mediation and the surviving spouse received a just settlement.

Circuit Court, Pasco County, Florida, 2009-DR-5319

Mr. Warren took on a seemingly unwinnable family law case after multiple attorneys declined it. The Father and Mother divorced in 2009, with the Father ordered to pay child support. However, the Mother soon moved out of state and left the child with the Father, who stopped paying support. In 2011, after prevailing in a relocation dispute, the Father obtained a final order awarding equal 50/50 custody. Because both parents earned similar incomes, the order expressly stated that “no action on child support is necessary at this time.” From 2011 to 2024, neither party paid child support. But in 2024, after the child turned 18, the Mother reappeared and submitted only the outdated 2009 order to the Florida Department of Revenue—claiming the Father owed years of unpaid support. The State, relying solely on the 2009 order, froze the Father’s accounts and issued a levy of around $50,000. Believing the issue was a simple misunderstanding, the Father represented himself at a magistrate hearing—and lost. The State began garnishing his wages, and by the time he sought legal help, the ten-day objection window had closed. Multiple attorneys advised him the case was hopeless. The Father then retained Warren Law Firm. Through extensive research and a novel legal theory, the Firm challenged the levy. In a contested hearing against the Department of Revenue, the Firm prevailed. The Honorable Judge Pearlman issued a detailed written order vacating the levy in full.